Deprecated: Function add_option was called with an argument that is deprecated since version 2.3.0 with no alternative available. in /home/newspape/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5675

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/newspape/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:5675) in /home/newspape/public_html/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/app/Common/Meta/Robots.php on line 87

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/newspape/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:5675) in /home/newspape/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
https://newspaperdeathwatch.com/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/ Chronicling the Decline of Newspapers and the Rebirth of Journalism Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:10:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.5 https://newspaperdeathwatch.com/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/comment-page-1/#comment-185 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:10:42 +0000 http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/08/11/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/#comment-185 Nice catch on McClatch. Hard to believe an entire newspaper could be worth that little. The value of the property alone has to be more than that. Why isn’t anyone buying up these bargains?

]]> https://newspaperdeathwatch.com/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/comment-page-1/#comment-184 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:07:44 +0000 http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/08/11/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/#comment-184 Don’t forget the Seattle Times. McClatchy filed a Securities and Exchange Commission filing which shows that McClatchy now values its 49.5% stake in The Seattle Times Co. at $9.9 million today, down from $19.3 million previously, and about 10 percent of the original $90 million value. Simple arithmetic shows that values the Seattle Times at only $20 million on today’s market, and indicates how much the Blethen ownership has devalued their properties.

]]> https://newspaperdeathwatch.com/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/comment-page-1/#comment-183 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:23:32 +0000 http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/08/11/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/#comment-183 …and John Edwards said he was 99 percent honests when he flatly denied last October that he had any relationship with Rielle Hunter, as the NE reported at that time. Where do you get this 95 percent correct statement? Betcha it’s from ABC, which also doesn’t justify the figure.

]]> https://newspaperdeathwatch.com/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/comment-page-1/#comment-182 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:23:33 +0000 http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/08/11/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/#comment-182 True that. But does that mean the story shouldn’t be reported by other media?

]]> https://newspaperdeathwatch.com/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/comment-page-1/#comment-181 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:15:07 +0000 http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/08/11/delusion-at-the-philly-inquirer/#comment-181 If the National Enquirer broke the news, and it was 95% accurate as you said… that would leave little to be reported on?

]]>