By paulgillin | November 17, 2010 - 9:02 am - Posted in Fake News is finally addressing complaints about licensing fees for its Kindle reader. Starting next month, the online retailing giant will give newspapers 70% of revenue from digital versions of their publications sold in Amazon’s Kindle Store. That’s what Apple and Google give developers for their iPhone, iPad and Android devices, so Amazon is merely playing catch-up.

Amazon also introduced Kindle Publishing for Periodicals, a program that’s intended “to speed up the process of producing a version of the newspaper for the many platforms where Kindle software can be downloaded,” according to CNN

Amazon has been criticized for being greedy in the royalties it extracts from news publishing clients. The change in royalty payments brings it in line with industry standards, and the new publishing platform is said to make it relatively painless for clients to get their content on Kindle-compatible devices, including the iPhone, iPad and Android. The move also appears to be aimed at the scarcity of iPhone-savvy coders, which is somewhat limiting the growth of that platform. ” Apple has sold more than 125 million gadgets — iPhones, iPods and the iPad — that run its mobile operating system. But finding developers capable of coding software for the system can be difficult and expensive,” CNN said.

Take Two Tablets and Call Me…

How big is the tablet market going to be? Really, really big, says Gartner, which sees nearly half a billion tablets selling in 2013 alone. The sudden explosion of this market seems curious in light of the fact that tablet – or “slate” – computers have been around for more than a decade. Gartner casts some interesting light on this phenomenon.

Early table computers were mainly Windows machines, meaning that they differed from PCs only in form.  Gartner points out that, in contrast, the usage model of the new breed of tablets “is closer to what consumers do with a smartphone…It is about running applications, playing games, watching video content, reading books and magazines…If you can do all of this without having to take five minutes to boot up, without having to look for a power outlet after a couple of hours… and with a user interface that allows you to easily get to what you need, why would you not buy a media tablet?” Makes sense.

We were at the Web 2.0 Summit this week, which ordinarily would have been lousy with laptop computers. However, we estimate that about one third of the attendees were toting iPads. Part of this trend is Silicon Valley chic, no doubt, but there’s no question that one appeal of the iPad is that it takes about 10 seconds to boot and the battery doesn’t die after 90 minutes. We found ourselves staring lovingly at the iPads being hoisted by others in our row as our laptop battery drained to zero.

Early tablet-makers obsessed over features like handwriting recognition and supporting an 800 X 600 screen. Apple chose instead to reinvent the experience around user need. Gartner sees the cost of tablets quickly dropping to under $300 as competition increases. Meanwhile, publishers are being careful not to screw up this market opportunity like they did the Web.

WaPo Gets Hyperlocal

The Washington Post is floating ideas about its next foray into online news and it looks like it’s going hyperlocal with a vengeance. TBD, itself a recent D.C.-area startup, reads the tea leaves from a recent Post survey and deduces that the newspaper is planning a major mobile thrust with a social networking flavor. TBD also quotes an anonymous source saying the plans include “this new crop of sites would be even more hyperlocal than AOL’s sites that are now spreading around the region. The mission of the Patch sites is to dig deep on municipal news, including school board meetings, high school sports, trash collection and the like.

The new Post initiative, says a source, would “carve things up even more micro” than the Patch sites, as in subdivision by subdivision. It’s unclear how the Post would fund such an initiative or find the volunteer citizen sources to do the reporting, but it’s breaking with the pack in making such a strong commitment to local coverage. Few publishers have the cash – or the cajones – to disrupt their traditional model to that degree.

Speaking of the Post, it just released a new iPad app that aggregates “social media conversations, videos, photos and user engagement through Twitter and Facebook about the top three to five issues of the day,” according to a press release picked up by Editor & Publisher. It’s free here for now, $3.99/mo. beginning in February.


US News & World Report, the former newsweekly that has been monthly for the last couple of years, will stop publishing its monthly magazine in 2011. The magazine, which is famous for its annual rankings of the best colleges, hospitals, personal finance and other businesses, will continue to publish the rankings in print along with four special topic issues. Everything else will go online.

US News has long been the weakest competitor in a three-horse race dominated by Time with Newsweek a distant second. The whole newsweekly sector has been devastated by online competition, forcing the Washington Post Co. to sell Newsweek this summer. Its circulation has plunged more than 25% in the last year.

The San Diego Union-Tribune is turning the tables on the traditional model of selling a printed newspaper and giving away electrons for free. The struggling daily, which was bought by private investment firm Platinum Equity last year, is offering readers a free copy of the  print edition when they use their mobile phones to check in on Foursquare, Gowalla or Facebook. All a checked-in member has to do is show a mobile device to workers at kiosks around the city. We’re sure the U-T’s newsdealers are just thrilled about this idea.

The Oregonian just got a $50,000 grant from the Knight Foundation via the American University’s J-Lab, and it’s going to spend the money on hyperlocal journalism. Read Editor Peter Bhatia’s passionate and persuasive argument for the need to adopt a “big tent” strategy and partner with localized news outlets of all shapes and sizes in order to “offer a level of local and neighborhood detail our staff…cannot get to.” It’s nice to see a newspaper editor embracing amateur journalism instead of dismissing it. “In the digital media world there really aren’t any limits on who can gather news and distribute it. Anyone with a laptop can create journalism,” he writes. The usual assortment of nut-nut commentators weighs in with their spew about how Bhatia is ruining the newspaper. He responds with admirable restraint.

Gannett Blog estimates that USA Today has five reporters covering Congress and 27 covering entertainment. We have no idea if those numbers are true, but if they are, we are going back to bed and putting a pillow over our head.



This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 17th, 2010 at 9:02 am and is filed under Fake News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


  1. November 25, 2010 @ 10:50 am

    About the iPad/tablets … ahem … told ya so… 🙂

    The previous lack of popularity for the free-roaming tablets was that they had been aimed at businesses.

    Businesses didn’t suggest it to Microsoft, they had desktop systems already and had reworked the entire concept of what work-stations/cubicle farms are and changed wiring in entire buildings.

    They had gone paperless within the offices because of the sheer amount of material they were producing.

    This means that the tablet came too late for them.

    Businesses don’t want their workers wandering around and possibly not keeping their nose to the grindstone, shoulder to the wheel, ear to the ground, while straddling the fence.

    The iPad/tablets are popular with everyone but businesses because their users can wander around not keeping their nose to the grindstone, shoulder to the wheel, ear to the ground, while straddling the fence.

    Posted by msbpodcast
  2. November 25, 2010 @ 10:36 pm

    Another thing about tablets and Microsoft.

    Despite Balmer, aka “Money Boy”, running around yelling “Developers, developers, developers” like a mad monkey spraying feces at the zoo visitors, Microsoft means something entirely different from “app” developers a la iPhone, iPad, Android developers.

    Businesses, Microsoft’s customers, see the development of application in an entirely different light. Applications are things developed to their own specifications for their own needs and for their strategic deployment.

    Software is an asset, not a salable good.

    It needs to be treated like an asset which means all kinds of standards to apply, change control mechanisms to be adhered to and deployment strategies to be followed.

    The rate at which software issues from the cloaca of big business is glacial compared to the fast-paced rough-and-tumble world of app development.

    Testing is on a vastly different scale too.

    Businesses bet the farm and spend huge amounts in training to develop anything.

    App developers just have to deal with the development framework from Apple or Google.

    Posted by msbpodcast
  3. December 5, 2010 @ 1:59 pm

    I’ve gotten out of podcasting, distributing my content “for free” over the internet, though my existing shows will be offered for as long as I can afford it, but I suspect that I will be writing an app, or several as I want to make my content as widely accessible as possible, and charging for all future content.

    MS has terrible appeal since it only hits .0833% of the population but the use of apps sets up a self-selecting demographic which will pay me to listen to me go on about this disease, the treatments available for it, my music and anything else that comes up.

    While I am not lonely in my day-to-day existence, I would really like to have a co-host or two with whom I could share the duties and the day to day existence of what, after all, this long strange trip is being.

    Maybe we can get people to listen.

    I just got a bunch of downloads of my shows, despite being off the wire/air since November 2009.

    Posted by msbpodcast